Rs 68.80 a dollar. Then it appreciated a bit, but there is no knowing what new depths it will plumb. Managers of the economy are hoping that it will find an ‘appropriate level’ at an ‘appropriate time’.
फ़ॉलोअर
Gurudas Dasgupta लेबलों वाले संदेश दिखाए जा रहे हैं. सभी संदेश दिखाएं
Gurudas Dasgupta लेबलों वाले संदेश दिखाए जा रहे हैं. सभी संदेश दिखाएं
बुधवार, 4 सितंबर 2013
at 3:58 pm | 0 comments | A.B.Bardhan, Chidambaram, Gurudas Dasgupta, insolvency, RBI, Subarao
Indian Economic Crisis – the Root and the Effect- A.B.Bardhan
Something akin to that has indeed
occurred in the last few days. Sensex figure has plunged precipitately shedding
more than a couple of thousand points. Rupee, the national currency of India,
the symbol of its sovereignty and stability has collapsed. It fell head over
heels in relation to the dollar. At the time of writing it has come down to
Rs 68.80 a dollar. Then it appreciated a bit, but there is no knowing what new depths it will plumb. Managers of the economy are hoping that it will find an ‘appropriate level’ at an ‘appropriate time’.
Rs 68.80 a dollar. Then it appreciated a bit, but there is no knowing what new depths it will plumb. Managers of the economy are hoping that it will find an ‘appropriate level’ at an ‘appropriate time’.
Indian economy is in deep crisis. Nobody
can now deny or ignore this fact, hoping that the ominous signs will disappear
and things will be back to normal.
The rate of growth which touched 8.5 for some
time and which the government touted as the second highest in the world has
come down to less than 5 per cent. It is in fact hovering between 4 and 5
during the year 2012-2013, and in the quarter April to June 2013, it came down
to 4.4 per cent, the lowest in 4 years.
Communist Party of India (CPI) MP Gurudas
Dasgupta poured out figures in Parliament to underline the depth of the
economic crisis. The Index of Industrial production which is key to economic
growth was 1.1 per cent in 2012-13 but it declined to – 1.6 per cent in May
2013 and then went down further to – 2.2 in June 2013. The decline continues
unabated. In the service sector this is only 6.6 which is the lowest in last 11
years. In agriculture, the mainstay of our economy the rate of growth is only
1.1 per cent while the population continues to grow at 2 per cent. Consumption
has gone down by 3.3 per cent since people don’t have money even to eat.
The foreign exchange reserve, which was 300 billion dollars, has now
come down to 275 million dollars. This is sufficient only for a few weeks or
so. India is on the brink of insolvency.
The shadow of 1991 hangs over the country. The prime minister has assured
us that it is not so. After all India of 2013 is not the India of 1991.
For people of his thinking–i.e. the bourgeois
elite, even the Food Security Bill, which has just gone through the Lok Sabha,
is to be blamed. They consider every measure that is orientated to bring a modicum
of relief to the poor as “populist”, an act of financial profligacy, as
something that throws the country’s finances out of gear and spells disaster.
They do not think so when a “package” is announced to bail out big business and
corporates or when concession, are handed out to them. That according to them are
necessary steps to stimulate the economy.
Yet, in 2010-11 alone the corporate tax
foregone was nearly Rs. 58,000 crore. In 2012-13 the estimated tax gone is Rs.
68,000 crore.
It
is true that the currency was devalued also in Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa,
and Turkey among the newly emerging economies. But the rupee is the
front-runner in a race to the bottom.
The men who run our economy have no clue to
the crisis that has overwhelmed them. Finance Minister Chidambaram is out to
find alibis when he shifts the blame on others. He has also blamed his ‘predecessor’
for the financial mess knowing that his predecessor is in no position to
reply. Now that the American economy is
on the recovery trail, he cites that as a reason for our disaster since capital
is flowing out there for investment.
The country is witnessing a bout of
sparring between the Finance Minister and the Governor of Reserve Bank of India
(RBI). Mr Subarao, RBI Governor, has in a recent remark observed, “I do hope Chidambaram
will one day say: I am often frustrated by RBI, so frustrated that I want to go
for a walk, even if I have to walk alone. But thank God, the RBI exists.”
In the process of this economic tsunami
the Indian people have suffered a loss of more than 2 lakh crores.
The
present crisis in India is not an isolated phenomenon. Capitalism is in
crisis. The world capitalist system is going through a prolonged recession. The
European Union has been passing through a recession for over three years.
Countries like Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy are the main scapegoats of this
downturn. The rate of unemployment in Greece has already reached the astounding
figure of 27.6 and even three or four bailout packages have not been able to
restore normalcy.
America itself had been going through a
crisis beginning with the sub-prime loan crisis four year back, which witnessed
the collapse of a number of American banks and financial institutions. The U.S.
market shrunk putting pressure on exports from emerging economies like India.
With the current signs of recovery in the U.S. the financial liquidity that has
been set in motion by the U.S. Federal Reserve has led to a sudden out load of
billions of dollars from countries like India, Indonesia and so forth,
depreciating their currencies. The US pushes the effect of both its recession
and its recovery on to the countries of the capitalist periphery.
Each country suffers the effect in its
own specific way following from the economic policies that its government has
been pursuing. In India the fiscal deficit and the current account deficit
which coincided caused the precipitate fall in the stock exchange and the
decline and volatility in the value of the rupee. It further unleashed
speculative pressure on the prices of commodities in the market, both of gold
on the one hand and vegetables on the other.
Even Ratan Tata, who is close to the
Indian ruling circles, was forced to remark that India has lost the confidence
of the world. He also said that the Government was ‘swayed’ by vested interests
in the private sector and policies had been changed, delayed and manufactured.
Since Tata himself is ‘a vested interest in the private sector’ it will be
interesting to know from him who is the vested interests he is pointing at.
The CPI had initiated a debate on the economic
crisis in Parliament on August 7, 2013. Gurudas Dasgupta charged, the country
is facing an economic tsunami because of the reckless policies of the
government. Non- performing government has generated a dangerous crisis, which
is almost an economic disaster thanks to their incapacity and inability….. The
livelihood of millions have been affected and crores of jobs have disappeared,
while farmers were also in grave distress.”
What solution does the Finance Minister
have to overcome the present crisis? Chidambaram begins by asserting, what we
need now is not less reforms, but more reforms, not more restrictions but less
restrictions, not a closed economy but a more open economy.” The 10-point plan
that he has proposed to drag the economy out of the mess is a reflection of
this resolve.
The first step in this direction is to
stabilize the rupee about which there seems to be no positive proposal.
The crisis is not a sudden development.
It is not a bolt from the blue. We from the Left have been pointing towards all
the portends that have eventually brought on the crisis. We have drawn
attention. We suggested measures and campaigned for them so as to bring down
inflation. The government persisted in taking steps which further fuelled
inflation. Repeated hikes in the prices of diesel and other petroleum products
were allowed to be taken. There is even talk of a further hefty rise in these
prices. They are only kept pending because the crisis overtook any such step.
How did Chidambaram react to the
devaluation of the rupee? While acknowledging that some government steps have
contributed to the devaluation of rupee, he went on to blame the judiciary for
barring or putting an elaborate process for mining, environmental clearance and
land acquisition. He admitted that the government had allowed the fiscal
deficit to be breached and current deficit to swell because of certain
decisions. They were allowed to be taken.
We
demanded that measures should be taken against closure of many industries and
manufacturing units which was causing tremendous job losses. Unemployment
figures including lack of jobs for educated and qualified youth were soaring.
The government talks of reforms. But what kind
of reforms? The Left has been demanding land
reforms, which should mean distribution of land to the landless that helps
restoring the agrarian economy. The bourgeois landlord dispensation has baulked
taking any such basic reforms. Our aim should be to create a people- friendly
socio- economic order in the country.
It necessary to curb imports,
particularly of luxury goods, and such goods that are manufactured in the
country. At the same time all efforts have to be made to increase India’s
exports with a view to ease the balance of payments in the country. The outflow
of dollars has to be substantially reduced.
A spate of investments whether public or
private has to take place in industries which contribute to job creation, and
in the education and health spheres. The emphasis has to be on mobilizing
domestic resources (which we do not lack) and domestic capital. Foreign capital
is welcome, but it can play only a supplementary role. The objective is to
improve the livelihood of our people which alone can be the basis of our future
development. Development strategy
borrowed from abroad, neo-liberal or any other, cannot help.
A decline in the basic parameters of the
economy may be followed by occasional signs of recovery, which will no doubt be
hailed by the beleaguered government spokesmen. But the main thing is the
stabilization of the economy at some time in the future.
It is important to invest in people. At a
time when it is essential to add to the purchasing power of our people, the
government is engaged in further restricting the people’s capacity in the name
of cutting down on expenditure. This always affects the poorer and toiling
sections since what is curtailed is the social security outgo and the subsidies
In fact the Left is pressing for fixing the minimum wage at a reasonably higher
figure. At the same time Left is demanding pension to all elderly citizens at
the rate of Rs.3000 per month.
The crying need is to reverse the neo- liberal
policies pursued at present, which only maximizes the profit of Big Business
and Corporate houses, while condemning the majority to poverty and deprivation.
Today a situation has emerged where the economic policies are dictated by the
corporates for the benefit of the corporates. As long as that persists there
may be marginal and occasional recovery while the general downturn and depression
continues.
The fall in the value of the rupee, the
chaos in the stock-market, the general decline in the economy, and the
uncertainty and instability that prevails in the country has its political
fall-out that threatens the democratic polity of our country. This requires a
separate treatment.मंगलवार, 3 सितंबर 2013
Gurudas Dasgupta's latest letter to the PM on the natural gas price increase scam to favour Reliance.
2/9/2013
Dear Dr. Manmohan Singh ji,
You would kindly recall the issue of gas price revision of RIL operated KG-D6 basin that I had raised in my earlier letters to you. You are also aware that the Finance Ministry has asked Petroleum ministry to examine the issue of pricing the shortfall quantities of gas at the old rate of $4.2 per mmbtu and the categorical rejection of this suggestion by the Petroleum Minister.
It has appeared in the press that the Petroleum Ministry has revised its earlier stand and has now circulated a Cabinet note to the effect that RIL shouldn’t get revised price on gas till the reasons for the fall in output are ascertained. It is further learnt that the Petroleum Ministry has proposed that if it reaches the conclusion that the fall was due to geological difficulties, then they would be allowed the benefit of the price increase to RIL.
The formulation of the Cabinet note in this fashion has again exposed the duplicity of the Petroleum Minister. You would recall that the government has consistently rejected the contention of RIL that the shortfall is due to geological difficulty. I would like to quote from the notice issued by the Government to RIL when cost recovery of $ 1 billion was sought to be disallowed in May 2012:
" You have failed to fulfill your obligations and to adhere to the terms of the PSC and are in deliberate and willful breach of PSC and have thereby caused immense loss and prejudice to the government.
As against the aforesaid required 31 wells to be drilled by April 2012 in accordance with the amended IDP, till date you have completed the drilling of only 18 wells and even out of these 18 wells, only 12 wells are presently in operation.
Your breach of PSC including failure to adhere to and comply with the Amended IDP have resulted in heavy loss of production of gas thereby causing loss to the Government and of scarce natural resource to the nation. You are not entitled to the recovery of costs incurred by you for the excess capacity created in block KG-DWN-98/3 and such recovery of costs has to be limited only to the extent of the infrastructure used by you for the production of the gas."
I may also add that this opinion was reached in consultation with Director General of Hydrocarbons ( DGH), the technical arm of the Petroleum Ministry. In fact the DGH wrote as many as seven letters between December 2010 and April 2011 pointing out the lapses on part of RIL and rejecting its contention of geological uncertainty. This was further re-iterated in the Management Committee meeting dated 17/3/2011. The same conclusion was also reached by the one man expert committee of Dr P Gopalkrishnan, a reservoir expert, who submitted his report to the Petroleum Ministry in April 2011. I must also point out that the Petroleum Ministry has also answered a number of questions in the Parliament wherein it rejected the claim of RIL regarding geological uncertainty.
Trying to re-open this issue, which had been conclusively settled by the previous Petroleum Minister, is a thinly disguised attempt to dilute the earlier stand of the government that the shortfall was on account of deliberate malfeasance of RIL. You are already aware that the present Petroleum Minister has deliberately stalled the arbitration proceedings for the recovery of the penalty of $ 1 billion. By trying to reverse the earlier view of the government, he is trying to weaken the arbitration proceedings and give an alibi to RIL to get away with its grave breach of the PSC.
Further, the Petroleum Minister has chosen not to consult the Fertiliser and Power ministries on this Cabinet note. Not consulting the biggest user ministries further shows the mala fides of the minister, to take a decision by stealth, without proper inter- ministerial consultation.
Since the Government has already taken a view that RIL had deliberately reduced production, the obvious conclusion has to be that the shortfall quantities have to be supplied at the old rates.I would like to re-iterate the financial benefits to the country if this decision were enforced. The shortfall in production in the years 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 against approved targets are 5 mmscmd, 28 mmscmd, 55 mmscmd, 66 mmscmd respectively. This means that the total shortfall over the last four years is a mammoth 154 mmscmd. If this quantity of natural gas were supplied at the old rate of $4.2 per mmbtu instead of the revised rate of $8.4 per mmbtu recently fixed by the government, this would mean a saving of $4.2 per mmbtu. Simple calculations show that for a total of 154 mmscmd of gas and a total price decrease of $4.2 per mmbtu would translate into a total saving of Rs. 63,000 crore for the country. I would request the government to insist that RIL supply the shortfall quantity at the old rates to ensure that their sinister design of deliberately reducing production does not result in windfall profits for them.
I earnestly re-iterate that the government insist that RIL supply the shortfall in gas production at the old rates. I would also request that the government reconsider the decision to raise prices of natural gas and keep it in abeyance until these issues are openly debated with all stakeholders.
With kind regards,
Yours sincerely,
(Gurudas Das Gupta)
Dr. Manmohan Singh,
Prime Minister,
South Block,
New Delhi-110001.
रविवार, 1 सितंबर 2013
'Very sceptical' about PM's statement on economy: Gurudas Dasgupta
New Delhi,August 30,2013
Communist Party of India (CPI) leader Gurudas Dasgupta on Friday said he was ' very sceptical' about Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh's statement on the present economic crisis, which will be made before the House today, and expressed that he did not think that the statement would have any immediate impact on the market.
"I am very sceptical because only two days back the Finance Minister made a statement. Therefore, I do not expect anything surprising from him. I do not think he will say anything which will immediately provoke any response in the market," Dasgupta said.
Dasgupta also predicted that the Prime Minister would focus his statement on the 'micro-management', like Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, instead of addressing the grassroot concerns of the people living through the economic meltdown.
"What the Finance Minister has said, he will harp on the same lines. The Finance Minister is very, very, clever. He was talking about the micro-management, about the CAD, about the fiscal consolidation-but the basic human problems that you are facing, regarding the price rise, regarding the job loss, regarding the retrenchment, regarding the instability in the market (was not talked about)," Dasgupta said.
"Spending more is the only solution, but they are not doing it. In fact, they are contracting; they are squeezing the expenditure," he added.
Meanwhile, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath on Friday raised hopes for Dr. Manmohan Singh's Parliamentary address on the state of the country's economy, and assured that the Prime Minister's speech would boost the economic situation in the country.
"The Prime Minister knows the economy better than anyone else and I'm sure his speaking in Parliament and telling the people of this country will have a message which will give a boost to the economy," Nath said.
Facing an attack over the economic situation amid a sliding rupee, Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh told the Parliament on Thursday that he would make a statement on the state of the economy on Friday.
"It cannot be denied that the country is facing a difficult economic situation... I do not deny that there are some domestic factors. But there are also international factors arising out of the change in the US economic stance," Dr. Singh said.
"There are also problems created due to tensions that are on the horizon in Syria and they have inevitable consequences for oil prices. I will be happy to make a statement tomorrow (Friday)," he added.
Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the Rajya Sabha met for the day, and demanded a statement by the Prime Minister outlining the steps that the Congress-led UPA II Government is contemplating to tackle the present economic situation.
He then took a dig at Finance Minister P Chidambaram's 10-point suggestions, saying it was just a "discourse in economic theory" when the country was actually moving towards stagflation.
Chidambaram had earlier on Tuesday suggested a 10-point formula to revive the country's economic situation, and sought co-operation from all quarters despite ideological and political differences.
Chidambaram, who was replying to a discussion on the country's economic situation in the Lok Sabha, said the country needs more reforms, lesser restrictions and an open economy.
The Finance Minister said the fiscal deficit would be contained at 4.8 percent of the GDP even after doling out subsidies for the implementation of the Food Security Bill.
He said the government is doing everything to boost investment.
Chidambaram also underlined the need to encourage manufacturing in sectors like power, steel, automobiles and textiles.
"We must increase production of electronics and textiles. We are importing things which we should not have imported. India can be strong only if we have a strong manufacturing economy," he said.
Communist Party of India (CPI) leader Gurudas Dasgupta on Friday said he was ' very sceptical' about Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh's statement on the present economic crisis, which will be made before the House today, and expressed that he did not think that the statement would have any immediate impact on the market.
"I am very sceptical because only two days back the Finance Minister made a statement. Therefore, I do not expect anything surprising from him. I do not think he will say anything which will immediately provoke any response in the market," Dasgupta said.
Dasgupta also predicted that the Prime Minister would focus his statement on the 'micro-management', like Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, instead of addressing the grassroot concerns of the people living through the economic meltdown.
"What the Finance Minister has said, he will harp on the same lines. The Finance Minister is very, very, clever. He was talking about the micro-management, about the CAD, about the fiscal consolidation-but the basic human problems that you are facing, regarding the price rise, regarding the job loss, regarding the retrenchment, regarding the instability in the market (was not talked about)," Dasgupta said.
"Spending more is the only solution, but they are not doing it. In fact, they are contracting; they are squeezing the expenditure," he added.
Meanwhile, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath on Friday raised hopes for Dr. Manmohan Singh's Parliamentary address on the state of the country's economy, and assured that the Prime Minister's speech would boost the economic situation in the country.
"The Prime Minister knows the economy better than anyone else and I'm sure his speaking in Parliament and telling the people of this country will have a message which will give a boost to the economy," Nath said.
Facing an attack over the economic situation amid a sliding rupee, Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh told the Parliament on Thursday that he would make a statement on the state of the economy on Friday.
"It cannot be denied that the country is facing a difficult economic situation... I do not deny that there are some domestic factors. But there are also international factors arising out of the change in the US economic stance," Dr. Singh said.
"There are also problems created due to tensions that are on the horizon in Syria and they have inevitable consequences for oil prices. I will be happy to make a statement tomorrow (Friday)," he added.
Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the Rajya Sabha met for the day, and demanded a statement by the Prime Minister outlining the steps that the Congress-led UPA II Government is contemplating to tackle the present economic situation.
He then took a dig at Finance Minister P Chidambaram's 10-point suggestions, saying it was just a "discourse in economic theory" when the country was actually moving towards stagflation.
Chidambaram had earlier on Tuesday suggested a 10-point formula to revive the country's economic situation, and sought co-operation from all quarters despite ideological and political differences.
Chidambaram, who was replying to a discussion on the country's economic situation in the Lok Sabha, said the country needs more reforms, lesser restrictions and an open economy.
The Finance Minister said the fiscal deficit would be contained at 4.8 percent of the GDP even after doling out subsidies for the implementation of the Food Security Bill.
He said the government is doing everything to boost investment.
Chidambaram also underlined the need to encourage manufacturing in sectors like power, steel, automobiles and textiles.
"We must increase production of electronics and textiles. We are importing things which we should not have imported. India can be strong only if we have a strong manufacturing economy," he said.
शनिवार, 24 अगस्त 2013
CPI's Dasgupta questions $8.4 an mBtu gas price
Communist Party of India (CPI) leader Gurudas Dasgupta on Thursday again trained guns on the Centre for the gas price rise.
In a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Dasgupta alleged the cost of production for Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL)’s KG-D6 block was just $ 2.74 a million British thermal unit (mBtu). He added the Rangarajan pricing formula would give them a windfall gain through a pricing of $8.4 an mBtu.
Dasgupta asked Singh to revisit the pricing of natural gas by the Rangarajan formula, applicable from April 2014. Citing petroleum ministry figures, Dasgupta said the ministry had admitted that after computing from the financial statement of RIL in 2011-12 on projected level of production, the cost of production, including levies, worked out to $2.74 an mBtu.“If the cost of production is only $2.74, how has Rangarajan come to the conclusion that it should be $8.4 per unit to be given to the contractor? Evidently, it is a case of lack of due diligence,” the letter said.
Earlier, Dasgupta had filed a public interest litigation regarding the decision on gas pricing at the apex court, on which the response from the petroleum ministry, RIL and minister M Veerappa Moily would be heard on September 6.
http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/cpi-s-dasgupta-questions-8-4-an-mbtu-gas-price-113082200883_1.html
In a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Dasgupta alleged the cost of production for Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL)’s KG-D6 block was just $ 2.74 a million British thermal unit (mBtu). He added the Rangarajan pricing formula would give them a windfall gain through a pricing of $8.4 an mBtu.
Dasgupta asked Singh to revisit the pricing of natural gas by the Rangarajan formula, applicable from April 2014. Citing petroleum ministry figures, Dasgupta said the ministry had admitted that after computing from the financial statement of RIL in 2011-12 on projected level of production, the cost of production, including levies, worked out to $2.74 an mBtu.“If the cost of production is only $2.74, how has Rangarajan come to the conclusion that it should be $8.4 per unit to be given to the contractor? Evidently, it is a case of lack of due diligence,” the letter said.
Earlier, Dasgupta had filed a public interest litigation regarding the decision on gas pricing at the apex court, on which the response from the petroleum ministry, RIL and minister M Veerappa Moily would be heard on September 6.
http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/cpi-s-dasgupta-questions-8-4-an-mbtu-gas-price-113082200883_1.html
मंगलवार, 2 जुलाई 2013
The gas price rise is without merits: Gurudas Dasgupta
Interview with CPI leader in Busines Standard :
Gurudas Dasgupta, a Communist Party of India senior, has been at the forefront in opposing a rise in the price of natural gas, on the ground that the real beneficiary is Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL). He explains his stand to Sanjay Jog. Edited excerpts:
What is your comment on the Centre's decision to increase the gas price from April 1, 2014?
Disastrous. Why was the pricing done in dollars when imported coal is not being so priced? Linking it with the dollar means the contractor will be the beneficiary. This was done during the BJP-led NDA government and the UPA government is continuing that line. In the wake of a declining exchange rate, the country will lose heavily and disproportionately.
Why are you opposing it?
The government has agreed to double the price without any scientific study of cost of production per unit, what has been the actual revenue and the profit. It is reported that the contractor has recovered much more that what was invested. Further, the government did not study the impact on the two main users, the fertiliser and power sectors.
The increase in the price of power per unit will involve more subsidy from the states. Stakeholders are not consulted and the government has taken the decision without due diligence. The government has responded to arm-twisting methods of corporate entities. Our battle will continue in and outside Parliament.
Do you stick to your earlier observation that the gas price rise is a scam?
Certainly. In view of the collusion between companies and the petroleum ministry, we have seen that a petroleum minister was removed in the past. Also, the timing: the deal has been struck on the eve of elections. It is a known fact that this corporate (read RIL) is generous in making political investments.
The finance minister said the rise was due to low domestic output.
A villain's argument. It will further accentuate price rise, will increase the electricity cost, spur the industrial cost of production and will ultimately be placed on the shoulders of consumers.
What were the options to avoid a gas price rise?
Why rely on a single contractor? As per the production sharing contract, the government should have taken control of the area in which the contractor had failed to produce. The government should have made the allocation of that area to other contractors, through international competitive bidding. That would have substantially reduced our dependence on a single contractor, as there would have been many more contractors. However, the government is deliberately allowing monopoly of a single contractor.
Do you want government to reconsider its decision?
The defaulting contractor (RIL) should have been put under pressure to produce the 80 million standard cubic metres a day of gas as promised in the contract. Instead, it has taken the statement of a single contractor as correct and decided to increase the gas price. It is the government's job to protect the interest of the country and also its natural resources.
The government has clearly defaulted in discharging its constitutional duty. It will have to review its decision and the rise in price must be done only after a proper technical evaluation.
शुक्रवार, 7 सितंबर 2012
at 6:31 pm | 0 comments | CPI, Economic Situation, Gurudas Dasgupta, Parliamentary Standing Committee
Gurudas Dasgupta's Note of dissent on present economic situation
Communist
Party of India (CPI) parliamentary group leader and CPI National Council
secretary Gurudas Das Gupta has said that the UPA-II
government has miserably failed over the years to stimulate inclusive growth
and rather did not succeed even to maintain the rate of GDP growth attained
earlier, which is today at an all-time low of 5.3 per cent. It could not
even hold the price line mainly of the essential commodities including food
articles.
The
veteran parliamentarian, also the AITUC general secretary, made these
observations in his dissent note on the report of the parliamentary standing
committee on finance concerning the present economic situation, submitted on
August 29, 2012.
Unfortunately,
the standing committee’s draft report as prepared failed to critically examine
the fundamentals of the economic policy and suggest effective alternatives
instead objectively approved the policy that has been pursued by the government,
he said. “It does not even refer to the futility of the policies and
non-performance of the government. In my view, the committee did not
discharge its responsibility by patting on the back of the government.”
Saying
that the present crisis cannot be attributed solely to the international
crisis, second in two years, Dasgupta said that the present policy of unguarded
liberalisation, reckless privatisation, unusual dependence on foreign funds,
over dependence on export market, failure to curb speculation in a situation of
scarcity, its total inability to provide economic empowerment to a vast section
of the majority of the people, galloping disparity of income and increasing
unprecedented concentration of wealth in the hands of the few form the basic
negative feature that has been overlooked by the committee.
The
report speaks of “economic
incentive regime for accelerating and sustaining growth.” It also states
that “the
committee, hence recommend that the FDI policy may be reviewed by the government
to ensure the above and make India an increasingly attractive and investor-friendly
destination for foreign investors.” It further says: “Our policies should
attract more long-term capital inflows and push investments through reforms.”
Thus,
the CPI group leader pointed out that the observations clearly approve the government
of India’s
FDI-friendly policy of economic reform, spelling out the undeniable message
that it is the foreign investment that will engineer the process of accelerated
economic growth obviously taking care of the basic human problems. “This
proposition has not been found to be correct anywhere in the world. The committee
rejecting all the Indian realities, by implication seeks to strengthen the
hands of the government to bulldoze its people-unfriendly economic
reform. The report will give a free hand to the government to allow FDI
in the retail trade, further tax concession to the corporates in the SEZs, it
will lead to more violation of labour laws and enable the government to infuse
FDI in the banking and insurance having proportionate voting rights. In
the name of attracting foreign funds it will bestow more concessions
undermining the national interest, making India the most attractive hunting
ground for the international players looking for unlimited profits exploiting
national resources and manpower.”
Stating
that primarily the growth of the economy depends on national resources augmenting
progressive tax revenue, broadening the tax base, reducing the tax concession,
holding up tax avoidance, by waging all out war to retrieve black money,
curbing unaccounted income, effectively fighting corruption and reducing
wasteful expenditure and relocating priorities in the process of budget making,
he said that nobody is denying the role of FDI in national development, which by all means is
subsidiary.
The direction of the report, which is extremely flawed is stereotyped and does
not search for alternative policy which the nation is looking for. There is no
word for stimulating the domestic market, enlarging the empowerment of the
marginalised majority.
The report in the background of the agricultural crisis does not call for heavy
public investment in agriculture, only asks for ‘infusion of funds’ without indentifying
the source of funds. While investment in agriculture has been dwindling
down over years, both public and private, the report does not “look beyond the nose,
makes a superfluous comment on the need of infusion of funds, which is unlikely
to happen.”
“Nevertheless
it is correct to say that private investment has a crucial role in a mixed
economy like India. But in a situation of gloom and downturn, it is
massive government investment targeted to augment the income of the common
people, for creating job, ensuring stability of income of the disadvantaged,
even incurring budget deficit can turn around the economy. Heavy
government investment will stimulate the market, generate the income, improve
aggregate demand and as a result market shall look up creating the atmosphere
for the inflow of profit oriented private investment, even draw foreign
funds. Unfortunately, the alternative perception is ignored and discarded
by the Report and in fact it strengthens the hands of the government to carry
forward the present anti-people economic policies”, the dissent note adds.
Criticising
the government for recommending the sale of family silver to meet the grocer’s bill, he said that the
report suggests disinvestment for raising revenue, when the market sentiment is
so negative. “The Committee unfortunately goes so far as to suggest 10 per cent
reduction in the non-plan expenditure which essentially suggests to reduce
subsidy obviously hurting the common people. This is quite in line with
what the present government wants to do. In the name of quoting RBI, the
report puts on record with concern the question of overshooting of subsidies.”
The
committee, he says, “even refers to with concern the impact of ‘retrospective tax
laws’ and
‘general
anti-tax avoidance rules’.
It calls upon the Government to modify/withdrawal these laws so that investors’ interest is not
hurt. It calls upon the government for the speedy enactment of the
financial reform Bill including Pension Fund Regulatory and Development
Authority Bill, the Companies Law Amendment Bill. The report undoubtedly
shall be a feather in the cap of Dr Manmohan Singh’s government.”
The
report in the name of strengthening the health of the banks “seeks to permit
the government for going for merger of the banks undermining the national
interest. It also opens the door for private investment in banks diluting
its public sector character.”
Since the report is one sided, seeks to strengthen the hand of the government
in pushing through all its corporate friendly reform programme at the cost of
the interest of the people, since the report does not locate the fundamental
anachronism in the economic policy that has led to a situation of slowdown and
food inflation, almost taking the country to the threshold stagflation, since
the report is in fact an apology for the inaction of the government and since
the report does not find any fundamental flaw in the policy and refrains from
outlining people friendly suggestions Dasgupta made it clear that he has no
other alternative but to put on record his dissent. “It is unfortunate
that the report is likely to serve as a readymade weapon in the hand of the government
to defend its failed economic policy running the country.”
सदस्यता लें
संदेश (Atom)
मेरी ब्लॉग सूची
-
CPI Condemns Attack on Kanhaiya Kumar - *The National Secretariat of the Communist Party of India issued the following statement to the Press:* The National Secretariat of Communist Party of I...7 वर्ष पहले
-
No to NEP, Employment for All By C. Adhikesavan - *NEW DELHI:* The students and youth March to Parliament on November 22 has broken the myth of some of the critiques that the Left Parties and their mass or...9 वर्ष पहले
-
रेल किराये में बढोत्तरी आम जनता पर हमला.: भाकपा - लखनऊ- 8 सितंबर, 2016 – भारतीय कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी के राज्य सचिव मंडल ने रेल मंत्रालय द्वारा कुछ ट्रेनों के किराये को बुकिंग के आधार पर बढाते चले जाने के कदम ...9 वर्ष पहले
Side Feed
Hindi Font Converter
Are you searching for a tool to convert Kruti Font to Mangal Unicode?
Go to the link :
https://sites.google.com/site/technicalhindi/home/converters
Go to the link :
https://sites.google.com/site/technicalhindi/home/converters
लोकप्रिय पोस्ट
-
अखनूर बस हादसे के लिये उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार पूरी तरह जिम्मेदार: डा॰ गिरीश भाकपा नेता ने म्रतकों के प्रति श्रद्धांजलि अर्पित की , घायलों क...
-
कल लाल किले की प्राचीर से प्रधानमंत्री श्री नरेंद्र दामोदर दास मोदी के भाषण पर मीडिया में खूब सराहना उंडेली गयी है. क्यों न उंडेली जाय. आखि...
-
लखनऊ 28, जुलाई – भारतीय कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी के एक प्रतिनिधि मंडल ने राज्य सचिव डा. गिरीश के नेत्रत्व में अलीगढ़ जनपद के लोधा थानान्तर्गत वीरमप...
-
अभी हाल में एक छात्रा के साथ दिल्ली में घटी हृदयविदारक घटना से उपजे गुस्से से दिल्ली की सड़कों पर एक आन्दोलन ने जन्म लिया था, जो केवल एक ...
-
जागरण में अंशुमान तिवारी ने एक लेख में लिखा है कि ”स्पेनी डुएंडे ने अमरीकी ब्लै कबियर्ड घोस्ट (दोनों मिथकीय प्रेत) से कहा ... अब करो दोहर...
-
Communist Party of India ( CPI ) leader Gurudas Dasgupta on Thursday again trained guns on ...
-
पटना भारतीय कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी की केंद्रीय परिषद ने ए. बी. वर्द्धन के स्थान पर एस. सुधाकर रेड्डी को अपना नया जनरल सेक्र...
-
यह दृश्य अधिकतर लोगों का देखा हुआ दृश्य है। लेकिन देखकर अनदेखा कर देना या भूल जाना सामान्य बात है। परसाई देखे हुए को परिभाषित करते हैं। सबस...
-
यह अंदर की बात है, पुलिस हारे साथ है दंगाई विश्व हिन्दू परिषद, बजरंग दल एवं शिवसैनिकों ने 6 दिसंबर, 1992 को पुलिस और अर्द्धसैनिक बलों ...



